Get Free Consultation!
We are ready to answer right now! Sign up for a free consultation.
I consent to the processing of personal data and agree with the user agreement and privacy policy

Understanding the relationship between liquidation proceedings, existing judicial orders and the legal obligations of a liquidator.
Liquidation provides an orderly framework for dealing with the affairs and assets of a distressed entity. However, its exercise must remain subject to existing legal and judicial obligations.
Where court orders are already in force, parties should ensure that steps taken during the liquidation process comply with those orders or seek appropriate directions from the Court through their legal advisers where necessary.
A recent decision of the High Court in the dispute involving the Kenya Union of Savings and Co-operatives (KUSCCO) has highlighted the relationship between liquidation proceedings and existing court orders affecting the assets of an entity.
The decision illustrates that the commencement of a liquidation process does not necessarily displace or operate independently of subsisting orders of the Court.
Bringing the affairs of an entity to an orderly conclusion.
Liquidation is the process through which the affairs of an entity are brought to an end, its assets are collected and realized, its liabilities addressed and any remaining assets distributed to those entitled to them.
The liquidator generally takes control of the entity’s affairs.
Assets are preserved, collected and, where appropriate, realized.
Claims and obligations are identified and addressed.
Available proceeds are distributed according to applicable priorities.
The applicable law determines who may commence the process.
The liquidator assumes important responsibilities.
The liquidator generally takes control of the entity’s affairs and is responsible for preserving and realizing its assets, recovering debts owed to the entity, dealing with creditor claims and distributing available proceeds in accordance with applicable priority rules.
Liquidation does not automatically erase a subsisting judicial order.
Where an entity or its assets are already subject to a subsisting court order, the commencement of liquidation does not automatically override that order.
Any person exercising liquidation powers must respect existing court orders. Where the liquidation process affects the subject matter of those orders, the appropriate course may be to seek the Court’s directions or have the orders varied or discharged through the proper legal process.
Several mechanisms help regulate the process.
A moratorium may stay or restrict certain legal proceedings concerning the company.
Alternatives such as administration may provide mechanisms for rescue and restructuring.
Appropriately licensed insolvency practitioners are responsible for acting as liquidators.
The Court may supervise the process and intervene where legally necessary.
Claims are addressed according to the applicable statutory order of priority.
Legal advice can help parties navigate complex insolvency proceedings.
Liquidation provides an orderly framework for dealing with the affairs and assets of a distressed entity. However, its exercise must remain subject to existing legal and judicial obligations.
Where court orders are already in force, parties should ensure that steps taken during the liquidation process comply with those orders or seek appropriate directions from the Court through their legal advisers where necessary.
At Wambui Gichui & Co. Advocates, we advise companies, creditors and other stakeholders on liquidation and insolvency matters, including the effect of liquidation on existing court orders and available alternatives and rescue mechanisms.
Speak to Our Legal Team